Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the Last 50 Years?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the Last 50 Years?
Jump to post #:
Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the Last ... - 3/5/2010 6:51:30 PM   
tacitus

 

Posts: 2312
Joined: 5/12/2005
Status: online
Ok, I just posted this in another thread, but I think it deserves a tread of its own. Why? Because I am tired of the nonsense that it's the Democrats who have moved to the left since the days of Kennedy and LBJ and not the Republicans that have moved to the right.

As proof that it is most certainly the Republicans who have done the shifting -- and radically so -- here are a whole bunch of quotes directly from the 1956 Republican Party Platform: (note, this was the party that owned the Presidency at the time): (emphases mine, of course):

quote:


We are proud of and shall continue our far-reaching and sound advances in matters of basic human needs—expansion of social securitybroadened coverage in unemployment insurance —improved housing—and better health protection for all our people. We are determined that our government remain warmly responsive to the urgent social and economic problems of our people. To these beliefs we commit ourselves as we present this record and declare our goals for the future.

We support this and his further offer of United States participation in an international fund for economic development financed from the savings brought by true disarmament. We approve his determined resistance to disarmament without effective inspection.

We shall continue vigorously to support the United Nations.

We also propose:

Legislation to enable closer Federal scrutiny of mergers which have a significant or potential monopolistic connotations;

Procedural changes in the antitrust laws to facilitate their enforcement;

Continuance of the vigorous SEC policies which are providing maximum protection to the investor and maximum opportunity for the financing of small business without costly red tape.

Under the Republican Administration, as our country has prospered, so have its people. This is as it should be, for as President Eisenhower said: "Labor is the United States. The men and women, who with their minds, their hearts and hands, create the wealth that is shared in this country—they are America."

The record of performance of the Republican Administration on behalf of our working men and women goes still further. The Federal minimum wage has been raised for more than 2 million workers. Social Security has been extended to an additional 10 million workers and the benefits raised for 6 1/2 million. The protection of unemployment insurance has been brought to 4 million additional workers. There have been increased workmen's compensation benefits for longshoremen and harbor workers, increased retirement benefits for railroad employees, and wage increases and improved welfare and pension plans for federal employees.

Stimulate improved job safety of our workers, through assistance to the States, employees and employers;

Continue and further perfect its programs of assistance to the millions of workers with special employment problems, such as older workers, handicapped workers, members of minority groups, and migratory workers;

Republican action created the Department of Health, Education and Welfare as the first new Federal department in 40 years, to raise the continuing consideration of these problems for the first time to the highest council of Government, the President's Cabinet.


http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25838

So, in 1956, the Republican Party, under the leadership of President Dwight D. Eisenhower , supported the United Nations, proudly proclaimed their expansion of federal government -- creating the Department of Health, Education and Welfare -- and proudly talked about how they had expanded Social Security and at they also increased minimum wage for millions of workers.

Were not talking about one or two minor changes here -- there are at least a dozen major policy statements that are derided as socialism by the conservatives today.

Now, let's take a look at some quotes from the 1956 Democratic Party platform:

quote:


The Democratic Party affirms that world peace is a primary objective of human society. Peace is more than a suspension of shooting while frenzied and fearful nations stockpile armaments of annihilation.

We in America need to make our peaceful purpose clear beyond dispute in every corner of the world—yet Secretary Dulles brags of "brinks of war." We need a foreign policy which rises above jockeying for partisan position or advantage—yet, not in memory has there been so little bipartisanship in the administration of our policies, so little candor in their Presentation to our people, so much pretending that things are better than they are.

The Democratic Party believes that "waging peace" is a monumental task to be performed honestly, forthrightly, with dedication and consistent effort.

The way to lasting peace is to forego bluster and bluff, to regain steadiness of purpose, to join again in faithful concert with the community of free nations, to look realistically at the challenging circumstances which confront us, to face them candidly and imaginatively, and to return to the Democratic policy of peace through strength.

We believe that, in the cause of peace, America must support the efforts of underdeveloped countries on a cooperative basis to organize their own resources and to increase their own economic productivity, so that they may enjoy the higher living standards which science and modern industry make possible. We will give renewed strength to programs of economic and technical assistance. We support a multilateral approach to these programs, where-ever possible, so that burdens are shared and resources pooled among all the economically developed countries with the capital and skills to help in this great task.

The Republican tax policy has joined hands in an unholy alliance with the hard-money policy. Fantastic misrepresentation of the Government's budgetary position has been used to deny tax relief to low- and middle-income families, while tax concessions and handouts have been generously sprinkled among potential campaign contributors to Republican coffers.

We pledge ourselves to equitable tax revisions and monetary policies designed to combine economic progress with economic justice. We condemn the Republican use of our revenue and money systems to benefit the few at the expense of the vast majority of our people;

We pledge ourselves to work toward the reduction and elimination of poverty in America;

We pledge ourselves to full parity of income and living standards for agriculture; to strike off the shackles which the Taft-Hartley law has unjustly imposed on labor; and to foster the more rapid growth of legitimate business enterprise by rounding this growth upon the expanding consuming power of the people;

We pledge ourselves to the restoration of truly competitive conditions in American industry. Affirmative action within the framework of American tradition will be taken to curb corporate mergers that would contribute to the growth of economic concentration.

The Democratic Party believes that America can and must adopt measures to assure every citizen an opportunity for a full, healthy and happy life. To this end, we pledge ourselves to the expansion and improvement of the great social welfare programs inaugurated under Democratic Administrations.

We shall continue to work for a stronger unemployment insurance system, with broader coverage and increased benefits consistent with rising earnings. We shall also work for the establishment of a floor to assure minimum level and duration of benefits, and fair eligibility rules.

During recent years there has developed a practice on the part of Federal agencies to delay and withhold information which is needed by Congress and the general public to make important decisions affecting their lives and destinies. We believe that this trend toward secrecy in Government should be reversed and that the Federal Government should return to its basic tradition of exchanging and promoting the freest flow of information possible in those unclassified areas where secrets involving weapons development and bona fide national security are not involved. We condemn the Eisenhower Administration for the excesses practiced in this vital area, and pledge the Democratic Party to reverse this tendency, substituting a rule of law for that of broad claims of executive privilege.


http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29601

Having read through the whole thing, there really is little substantive difference except in the areas of energy and the environment, where obviously times have changed in the last 50 years, but the rest of the domestic Democratic party platform wouldn't be much out of place today, and certainly the foreign policy of peaceful engagement and cooperation was as much a central plank of the Democrats then as it is now for President Obama.

So, can we now give up on this nonsense that Democrats are somehow far to the left of where they were 50 years ago?

(I suspect not, but I will just have to keep pointing out that you can't rewrite history!
Post #: 1
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/5/2010 7:08:42 PM   
SonInMe1

 

Posts: 1465
Joined: 4/16/2005
From: my mom by God
Status: offline
lol

_____________________________

You adulterous people, don't you know that friendship with the world is hatred toward God? Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God.

James 4:4
Post #: 2
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/5/2010 7:16:03 PM   
rcjames


Posts: 8180
Joined: 7/15/2005
From: Oklahoma
Status: offline
Both parties have moved to the left (more government control) and the democrats are really out there dabbling in socialism and worse.

Thanks
RC

_____________________________

Just a country Preacher's humble opinion

Read the first chapter of my latest book here;
http://www.deliveranceofsara.com
Post #: 3
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/5/2010 7:18:45 PM   
GodandGuns


Posts: 1507
Joined: 10/1/2008
From: The Sound of Madness
Status: offline
have to agree with RC. both parties now could really care less about the people and only how to make themselves richer

_____________________________

FOR THOSE WHO HAVE FOUGHT FOR IT, FREEDOM HAS A TASTE THE PROTECTED WILL NEVER KNOW.

The Medic, the unsung hero on every battlefield. It is impossible to imagine the mental/emotional trauma inside a Medic, and there is no triage for that.
Post #: 4
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/5/2010 7:25:17 PM   
litfire2000


Posts: 711
Joined: 7/6/2008
Status: offline
Nice try...I'm sure you could find even more examples if you searched for them...there is a growing polarization taking place in America politics which I find abhorrent...it is encouraged by a small number of self seeking individuals who have made a fortune playing on people's fear...my opinion by the way and I hope I am still entitiled to have my own opinion especially since it opposes those self seeking individuals who, again my own opinion, seem bent on undermining the very principles America stands for by claiming those others who disagree with them "hate America"...oh, I could go on and on but suffice it to say I wish more people would quit listening to the "far left" and/or "far right" media and concentrate on America, her past, present and future in honest reality.

_____________________________

Ps. 122:6 Pray for the peace of Jerusalem

Many people desire to serve God in the capacity of an advisor
Post #: 5
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/5/2010 7:26:54 PM   
SonInMe1

 

Posts: 1465
Joined: 4/16/2005
From: my mom by God
Status: offline
I disagree that both parties are the same...and after the midterm elections true conservatism will, hopefully, make a return.

I do agree that the failings of the repoublican party has been its going to the left...its pandering. The Bush's destruction of Reagan's legacy. The idea the republican party must be centrist to win elections.

We let the liberals decide what we should be.

We started to look to the government as the solution to problems and not personal responsibility.

The democratic party is not the party of JFK.

Obama is a radical extremist.

As I and many others predicted, Obama is losing support amungst his own party because no matter what they say, the majority of democrats are extreme radicals with their own agendas and a consensus in the party to get things done will probably never happen.

_____________________________

You adulterous people, don't you know that friendship with the world is hatred toward God? Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God.

James 4:4
Post #: 6
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 12:27:45 AM   
relady

 

Posts: 634
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Greater St. Louis Metro
Status: offline
Those 1956 platforms represent two parties I could get behind. But of course, that was back before you had to call someone who disagreed with you "evil." Politically we were MUCH better off back then, and surprisingly the government actually got some things done. I'm just glad to know that the extreme right wing views plastered out here only really represent about 20% of the population, if that. They just tend to be really loud and obnoxious. I'm buying stock in earplugs.

I'm glad Eisenhower got the interstate system put together when he did....because it surely would never get done now. You'd have almost half the country screaming that dirt roads are just fine why do we need to try to progress. LOLOL. Well, it would be funny if it weren't so sad. So very very sad that people don't care about anything but their own little sphere. And how much sadder that those people call themselves Christians.
Post #: 7
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 1:05:20 AM   
sue244


Posts: 838
Joined: 6/7/2006
From: Colorado
Status: offline
Going back to 1956 is fine except that it fails to take into account the complete political realignment that happened in the 60s. In my American Century class we talked about how prior to the 1960s both parties had a conservative and liberal faction with in the party. I know for myself looking at history there are some times I side with the Democrats and sometimes I side with the Republicans on issues in history due to which faction was controlling the party at that point in time. During the 60s though the conservative branch of the Democrats left and became Republicans and the liberal branch of the Republicans became Democrats.

_____________________________

It is a remarkable fact that all the heresies which have arisen in the Christian Church have had a decided tendency to 'dishonor God and to flatter man. Spurgeon
Never let us be guilty of sacrificing any portion of truth on the altar of peace. Ryle
Post #: 8
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 7:09:45 AM   
freakofnature


Posts: 160
Joined: 1/17/2008
Status: offline
It's easy to explain away that there are conservatives and then there are progressives who claim to be republicans.
Post #: 9
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 7:14:17 AM   
SonInMe1

 

Posts: 1465
Joined: 4/16/2005
From: my mom by God
Status: offline
Fraudulant schemes, like health care and cap and trade can in no way be compared to a national highway system.

_____________________________

You adulterous people, don't you know that friendship with the world is hatred toward God? Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God.

James 4:4
Post #: 10
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 7:21:42 AM   
wing2000

 

Posts: 1199
Joined: 4/14/2005
From: ...the beautiful Sonoran Desert
Status: offline
...simply the fact that the likes of J.D. Hayworth has a shot at John McCains Senate seat speaks volumes. Thankfully, one-third of Arizona voters are Independents....



btw, I noticed a J.D. political add on Crosswalk this AM declaring "Which side will you pick?" ...with McCain's picture shrouded in red.....
Post #: 11
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 7:57:35 AM   
buckifn

 

Posts: 1652
Joined: 5/23/2006
Status: offline
Both parties are equally off course. I think both should be disbanded. I don't believe in party affiliation. It's deception from the word "Go" to insinuate one party has all the answers, or the best candidates, or the well bring of the country in mind.
Post #: 12
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 8:55:21 AM   
TrojanHusker


Posts: 277
Joined: 2/24/2010
From: Nebraska
Status: offline
From the Republican Leadership Council in June 2009 -
"Extreme conservatism, especially extreme social conservatism, is a losing strategy. Any winning strategy for Republican domination must not alienate moderates; we can't win without them."

I can recall the Democratic Party Leadership saying this sort of thing about liberals in the '60s.
Post #: 13
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 10:50:14 AM   
mikeman2

 

Posts: 272
Joined: 9/23/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tacitus

Ok, I just posted this in another thread, but I think it deserves a tread of its own. Why? Because I am tired of the nonsense that it's the Democrats who have moved to the left since the days of Kennedy and LBJ and not the Republicans that have moved to the right.

As proof that it is most certainly the Republicans who have done the shifting -- and radically so -- here are a whole bunch of quotes directly from the 1956 Republican Party Platform: (note, this was the party that owned the Presidency at the time): (emphases mine, of course):

quote:


We are proud of and shall continue our far-reaching and sound advances in matters of basic human needs—expansion of social securitybroadened coverage in unemployment insurance —improved housing—and better health protection for all our people. We are determined that our government remain warmly responsive to the urgent social and economic problems of our people. To these beliefs we commit ourselves as we present this record and declare our goals for the future.

We support this and his further offer of United States participation in an international fund for economic development financed from the savings brought by true disarmament. We approve his determined resistance to disarmament without effective inspection.

We shall continue vigorously to support the United Nations.

We also propose:

Legislation to enable closer Federal scrutiny of mergers which have a significant or potential monopolistic connotations;

Procedural changes in the antitrust laws to facilitate their enforcement;

Continuance of the vigorous SEC policies which are providing maximum protection to the investor and maximum opportunity for the financing of small business without costly red tape.

Under the Republican Administration, as our country has prospered, so have its people. This is as it should be, for as President Eisenhower said: "Labor is the United States. The men and women, who with their minds, their hearts and hands, create the wealth that is shared in this country—they are America."

The record of performance of the Republican Administration on behalf of our working men and women goes still further. The Federal minimum wage has been raised for more than 2 million workers. Social Security has been extended to an additional 10 million workers and the benefits raised for 6 1/2 million. The protection of unemployment insurance has been brought to 4 million additional workers. There have been increased workmen's compensation benefits for longshoremen and harbor workers, increased retirement benefits for railroad employees, and wage increases and improved welfare and pension plans for federal employees.

Stimulate improved job safety of our workers, through assistance to the States, employees and employers;

Continue and further perfect its programs of assistance to the millions of workers with special employment problems, such as older workers, handicapped workers, members of minority groups, and migratory workers;

Republican action created the Department of Health, Education and Welfare as the first new Federal department in 40 years, to raise the continuing consideration of these problems for the first time to the highest council of Government, the President's Cabinet.


http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25838

So, in 1956, the Republican Party, under the leadership of President Dwight D. Eisenhower , supported the United Nations, proudly proclaimed their expansion of federal government -- creating the Department of Health, Education and Welfare -- and proudly talked about how they had expanded Social Security and at they also increased minimum wage for millions of workers.

Were not talking about one or two minor changes here -- there are at least a dozen major policy statements that are derided as socialism by the conservatives today.

Now, let's take a look at some quotes from the 1956 Democratic Party platform:

quote:


The Democratic Party affirms that world peace is a primary objective of human society. Peace is more than a suspension of shooting while frenzied and fearful nations stockpile armaments of annihilation.

We in America need to make our peaceful purpose clear beyond dispute in every corner of the world—yet Secretary Dulles brags of "brinks of war." We need a foreign policy which rises above jockeying for partisan position or advantage—yet, not in memory has there been so little bipartisanship in the administration of our policies, so little candor in their Presentation to our people, so much pretending that things are better than they are.

The Democratic Party believes that "waging peace" is a monumental task to be performed honestly, forthrightly, with dedication and consistent effort.

The way to lasting peace is to forego bluster and bluff, to regain steadiness of purpose, to join again in faithful concert with the community of free nations, to look realistically at the challenging circumstances which confront us, to face them candidly and imaginatively, and to return to the Democratic policy of peace through strength.

We believe that, in the cause of peace, America must support the efforts of underdeveloped countries on a cooperative basis to organize their own resources and to increase their own economic productivity, so that they may enjoy the higher living standards which science and modern industry make possible. We will give renewed strength to programs of economic and technical assistance. We support a multilateral approach to these programs, where-ever possible, so that burdens are shared and resources pooled among all the economically developed countries with the capital and skills to help in this great task.

The Republican tax policy has joined hands in an unholy alliance with the hard-money policy. Fantastic misrepresentation of the Government's budgetary position has been used to deny tax relief to low- and middle-income families, while tax concessions and handouts have been generously sprinkled among potential campaign contributors to Republican coffers.

We pledge ourselves to equitable tax revisions and monetary policies designed to combine economic progress with economic justice. We condemn the Republican use of our revenue and money systems to benefit the few at the expense of the vast majority of our people;

We pledge ourselves to work toward the reduction and elimination of poverty in America;

We pledge ourselves to full parity of income and living standards for agriculture; to strike off the shackles which the Taft-Hartley law has unjustly imposed on labor; and to foster the more rapid growth of legitimate business enterprise by rounding this growth upon the expanding consuming power of the people;

We pledge ourselves to the restoration of truly competitive conditions in American industry. Affirmative action within the framework of American tradition will be taken to curb corporate mergers that would contribute to the growth of economic concentration.

The Democratic Party believes that America can and must adopt measures to assure every citizen an opportunity for a full, healthy and happy life. To this end, we pledge ourselves to the expansion and improvement of the great social welfare programs inaugurated under Democratic Administrations.

We shall continue to work for a stronger unemployment insurance system, with broader coverage and increased benefits consistent with rising earnings. We shall also work for the establishment of a floor to assure minimum level and duration of benefits, and fair eligibility rules.

During recent years there has developed a practice on the part of Federal agencies to delay and withhold information which is needed by Congress and the general public to make important decisions affecting their lives and destinies. We believe that this trend toward secrecy in Government should be reversed and that the Federal Government should return to its basic tradition of exchanging and promoting the freest flow of information possible in those unclassified areas where secrets involving weapons development and bona fide national security are not involved. We condemn the Eisenhower Administration for the excesses practiced in this vital area, and pledge the Democratic Party to reverse this tendency, substituting a rule of law for that of broad claims of executive privilege.


http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29601

Having read through the whole thing, there really is little substantive difference except in the areas of energy and the environment, where obviously times have changed in the last 50 years, but the rest of the domestic Democratic party platform wouldn't be much out of place today, and certainly the foreign policy of peaceful engagement and cooperation was as much a central plank of the Democrats then as it is now for President Obama.

So, can we now give up on this nonsense that Democrats are somehow far to the left of where they were 50 years ago?

(I suspect not, but I will just have to keep pointing out that you can't rewrite history!

The entire US political makeup has been taken over by progressives since the turn of the century. However, now that this movement has left us with ballooning debt and entitlement policies going belly up we must now turn to something new. The entire progressive movement is based upon one premise that we can live beyond our means. As we saw with the credit crisis, government cannot continue to intervene to help provide people with mortgages they are not going to be able to afford by forcing lenders to lend to high risk individuals. The government cannot afford to review Medicare and Medicaid going belly up and only seek to expand it etc. Of course, all of this stems from FDR's vision and his second bill of rights which include the right to a house, a fair wage, medical coverage, retirement etc. Contrary to the first bill of rights which restricted government power, the second bill of rights does the polar opposite. With FDR's second bill of rights government expands as it tramples over the Founding Fathers notion of limited government.

In short, the progressive movement needs a new vision that was not created in the 1930's. Progressivism will end, it must end, because, as Obama has already stated, it is unsustainable. I just hope it is not at the price of my country and the entire world economy.

_____________________________

Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick himself up and continue on.
-Winston Churchill.
Post #: 14
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 10:58:05 AM   
KaptZ

 

Posts: 643
Joined: 10/28/2009
From: The swamps of Jersey
Status: offline
Being a independent I have always had mixed feelings about both parties. My parents were both republicans since they were young(1950s) so I picked up their growing disatisfaction with that party more than anything about the Dems. Mom and Dad definately felt that the Republican Party had drifted too far to the right as far back as Reagan. By the time Dubya was elected the second time Mom was so disgusted she had become a Democrat and joined the ACLU.

You must understand, that was like the Pope becoming a atheist.
Post #: 15
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 11:30:11 AM   
mikeman2

 

Posts: 272
Joined: 9/23/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KaptZ

Being a independent I have always had mixed feelings about both parties. My parents were both republicans since they were young(1950s) so I picked up their growing disatisfaction with that party more than anything about the Dems. Mom and Dad definately felt that the Republican Party had drifted too far to the right as far back as Reagan. By the time Dubya was elected the second time Mom was so disgusted she had become a Democrat and joined the ACLU.

You must understand, that was like the Pope becoming a atheist.

People keep saying that the government has drifted to the right but with what evidence? In fact, "W" passed one of the largest entitlement programs in US history rivaling the Great Society programs of LBJ. In fact, Obama jokes about not knowing how to pay for it.

So what was so rightwinged about "W"? Was it because he opposes abortion? Is it because he went to war that all the Dems in Congress voted for? LOL. What you are seeing now is the same things happening to Obama that happened to "W" in terms of popularity because the two insist on seeking to expand spending with reckless abandon and people are sick of it.

_____________________________

Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick himself up and continue on.
-Winston Churchill.
Post #: 16
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 11:37:09 AM   
bob97


Posts: 1203
Joined: 6/24/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline
In general both parties are progressive in nature, with few exceptions. This is the nature of secular man...trusting in man rather than God.

In Messiah,

Bob

_____________________________

The LORD clears the road for me!
The LORD is my high ridge, my stronghold, my deliverer!
Post #: 17
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 8:24:23 PM   
Tarox


Posts: 725
Joined: 2/18/2009
Status: offline
Sorry, in the Conservative States of America, truth, logic, intelligence, and proof have no meaning.

The amount of right wing partisan hackery is astounding... as CS Lewis said: "the trouble about trying to make yourself stupider than you really are is that you very often succeed." This is what's happened to the most extreme segments of the right wing, many of whom are frequent posters.
Post #: 18
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 9:35:20 PM   
tacitus

 

Posts: 2312
Joined: 5/12/2005
Status: online
Some interesting comments, but I haven't seen anyone refuting the fact that the Republican Party Platform of today is much more conservative than the one I excerpted, and that many of the liberal principles at work in the Democratic Party today can be found just as easily in their 1956:

- strength abroad through peaceful cooperation
- expansion of social welfare programs
- opposition to tax cuts for the rich
- regulation of the excesses of the free market

If you want another example, just go and watch LBJ's 1964 Democratic nomination acceptance speech. If anything, it is further to the left than any policy speech Obama has given today.

Trying to cast Obama as some johnny-come-lately socialist simply doesn't wash. He's increased military spending, he's increased the number of troops in Afghanistan while maintaining the pre-existing plan in Iraq, he's maintained most, if not all, of the security powers aggregated by Bush and Cheney, and defended their use in court (except for torture, that is) and he's cut $300 billion in taxes in one year (not that conservatives ever remember that bit of the stimulus). Even the proposed health care plan includes cuts in Medicare -- a social welfare program if there ever was one -- to help pay for the overall plan.

Seriously if Obama is a socialist then I will eat my left shoe. Obama has done virtually nothing in the last year in these major areas that a real socialist would have done. A real socialist would have withdrawn more troops from Iraq, he would have cut military spending, there would have been no tax cuts in the stimulus bill, he would have shed many of the security powers Bush and Cheney aggregated to the Presidency, and there would have been a greatly expanded version of health care reform on the table. These are all things that the left of the Democratic party wanted him to do, and he's done none of them.

I can't help it if some of you can't see it, but calling Obama a socialist is to deprive the term socialism of all possible meaning. When you either have to be a fascist or a libertarian not to be a called socialist, then it's time to recalibrate the scale to something a little more sensible.

On the other hand, when you have a dozen or more bullet points from the national Republican Party platform of 50 years ago what would all be scorned and derided as socialism or even communism by the right wing conservatives of today, it's pretty easy to see which party's been doing most of the heavy lifting when it comes to shifting positions along the political spectrum since that time.
Post #: 19
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 9:58:50 PM   
SonInMe1

 

Posts: 1465
Joined: 4/16/2005
From: my mom by God
Status: offline
Who was Barry Goldwater?

Why 1956? Is it possible your example is just another example of the Rockefeller republicans ( left leaning ) that come to the top once in a while?

Bush was no conservative. He tried to run as one. He did not tax us to death...or cause recessions with taxations but he still looked for government solutions.

I don't care if the republican party was less conservative in its past. Compare what JFK supported and what Obama supports and you will see the leftward turn of the democratic party.

In other words you are cherrypicking left leaning times of the republican party to support the same old liberal ploy of trying to get the republican party to destroy itself by going toward the middle.

Nice try but we ain't as dumb as you think we are.

Repiublicans cannot win a national election by going to the middle. McCain proved that....but the democrats sure think we should go left...gee...wonder why?

Now, democrats cannot win an election by being liberal, they must go to the center to win national elections, so maybe they think every politician should...I'll give you that....but its also 100% false.

You can try to charactorize republicans as racists, or bumpkins or the evil conservative but no matter what your sipn, this nation is still conservative and as long as it is great, will always be conservative.

Nice try.

_____________________________

You adulterous people, don't you know that friendship with the world is hatred toward God? Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God.

James 4:4
Post #: 20
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 10:31:00 PM   
tacitus

 

Posts: 2312
Joined: 5/12/2005
Status: online
McCain might have won but for his bungling of the economic crisis and his attempt to capture the right wing vote by nominating Sarah Palin.

I haven't studied Kennedy's platform, but what evidence do you have that he is any more right wing than Obama? Sure he faced down the Cuban Missile Crisis -- but remember he did it over the heads of his conservative general staff who wanted to break out the nukes and go to war. Did he act more like Obama or Cheney by making that decision? And I have given two examples 1956 and 1964, either side of Kennedy, where the liberal party platform was present then as it is now.

If anyone is cherry picking, it's you -- and only because Kennedy is such an unimpeachable hero to the American public that even you can't go after him.

And stop accusing me of accusing conservatives as racists. I have never done that on this forum, so you can pack that in right now.
Post #: 21
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 10:46:15 PM   
SonInMe1

 

Posts: 1465
Joined: 4/16/2005
From: my mom by God
Status: offline
quote:

Kennedy's platform, but what evidence do you have that he is any more right wing than Obama?


He proposed tax cuts for the rich.

_____________________________

You adulterous people, don't you know that friendship with the world is hatred toward God? Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God.

James 4:4
Post #: 22
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 10:51:57 PM   
iluvatar


Posts: 3532
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: online
quote:

ORIGINAL: SonInMe1

quote:

Kennedy's platform, but what evidence do you have that he is any more right wing than Obama?


He proposed tax cuts for the rich.


What was the tax rate he started out with?

-Dan.

_____________________________

Well, I've been to one world fair, a picnic, and a rodeo, and that's the stupidest thing I ever heard come over a set of earphones.
Post #: 23
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/6/2010 11:02:06 PM   
tacitus

 

Posts: 2312
Joined: 5/12/2005
Status: online
Not that impressive when you actually read about the circumstances of his *proposal*:

http://www.msjc.edu/econ/jfk022502.htm

Let's Review: The top rate was 91% at the time, far different than the < 40% of today. JFK had all kinds of proposals to increase spending on a whole variety of domestic programs ('defense, education, urban renewal, regional economic development, worker training and medical care for the aged.") but was blocked by Congress, and cutting taxes was not the first or even second choice to fix the problems they were faced with.

The conservative myth of Kennedy hardly matches reality. He was a liberal who reluctantly proposed tax cuts after he was blocked from increasing spending.

And I notice that you still don't give any credit to Obama for his $300 billion in tax cuts last year (and another $15 billion this month). I guess they don't count because they don't just help rich people, or something? If you are comparing like with like, then Obama should really be another conservative icon for cutting taxes last year.
Post #: 24
RE: Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the L... - 3/7/2010 1:04:51 AM   
mikeman2

 

Posts: 272
Joined: 9/23/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tacitus

Some interesting comments, but I haven't seen anyone refuting the fact that the Republican Party Platform of today is much more conservative than the one I excerpted, and that many of the liberal principles at work in the Democratic Party today can be found just as easily in their 1956:

- strength abroad through peaceful cooperation
- expansion of social welfare programs
- opposition to tax cuts for the rich
- regulation of the excesses of the free market

If you want another example, just go and watch LBJ's 1964 Democratic nomination acceptance speech. If anything, it is further to the left than any policy speech Obama has given today.

Trying to cast Obama as some johnny-come-lately socialist simply doesn't wash. He's increased military spending, he's increased the number of troops in Afghanistan while maintaining the pre-existing plan in Iraq, he's maintained most, if not all, of the security powers aggregated by Bush and Cheney, and defended their use in court (except for torture, that is) and he's cut $300 billion in taxes in one year (not that conservatives ever remember that bit of the stimulus). Even the proposed health care plan includes cuts in Medicare -- a social welfare program if there ever was one -- to help pay for the overall plan.

Seriously if Obama is a socialist then I will eat my left shoe. Obama has done virtually nothing in the last year in these major areas that a real socialist would have done. A real socialist would have withdrawn more troops from Iraq, he would have cut military spending, there would have been no tax cuts in the stimulus bill, he would have shed many of the security powers Bush and Cheney aggregated to the Presidency, and there would have been a greatly expanded version of health care reform on the table. These are all things that the left of the Democratic party wanted him to do, and he's done none of them.

I can't help it if some of you can't see it, but calling Obama a socialist is to deprive the term socialism of all possible meaning. When you either have to be a fascist or a libertarian not to be a called socialist, then it's time to recalibrate the scale to something a little more sensible.

On the other hand, when you have a dozen or more bullet points from the national Republican Party platform of 50 years ago what would all be scorned and derided as socialism or even communism by the right wing conservatives of today, it's pretty easy to see which party's been doing most of the heavy lifting when it comes to shifting positions along the political spectrum since that time.

As you point out, Obama is doing much of what Bush and Cheney had begun, only on a larger scale. That is why his popularity is rapidly declining as did Bush and Cheney.

As for pointing out that Obama has spent large amounts of money militarily, I don't see how this makes a lick of difference. After all, those on the left have traditionally been prone to battle. Just look at the former USSR as they invaded Eastern Europe and Afghanistan. Look at every US war that was started under a Democrat except under the Bush Presidents. I think you will find that those on the left are very much authoritarian in nature. In fact, they want to fine me for not purchasing medical insurance and turn the EPA into the KGB by monitoring and regulating my energy expenditures. Obama also wants to continue to spend like a drunken sailor which will only add to our debt as it transforms us into a slave-like society. It will matter little who follows him because the debt he runs up must be payed. The decisions for succeeding administrations are being made for them in advance.

When talking about Obamacare, don't forget that he intends on covering 30 million more people as the current system is going belly up. That is continued government expansion. Even though it does not fit your perfect definition of socialism, it certainly is the road to it. Also, don't forget Obama nationalized GM and AIG etc. I think you will find that a perfect socialist, if there was ever one, would have to take incremental steps into convering the US into a socialist country rather than large ones and that is exactly what Obama is doing.

I think you might be right about the Republican party. Now days they seem to be shifting right. However, with progressives like Bush and McCain who have sunk the Republican party what choice do they have if they wish to survive?

_____________________________

Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick himself up and continue on.
-Winston Churchill.
Post #: 25
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> Which Party Has Really Become More Extreme in the Last 50 Years?
Jump to post #:
Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



  Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI